Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREIBlock Scheduling

What's inside.

Primer and FAQ

Schools

Discussion

Research & Resources

Project Home

Other resources

CAREI Home

College of Education and Human Development

University of Minnesota

Block Sceduling Logo

 

 

 

freem013@umn.edu
CAREI - Block Scheduling
University of Minnesota
360 Education Sciences Building
56 East River Road
Minneapolis, MN
55455-0364 USA
Tel: 612-625-6541
Fax: 612-625-3086

 

CAREI > Current Projects > Block Scheduling

Primer and FAQ

Block Scheduling Primer

Most frequently asked questions and answers regarding:

Other Q & A Site:

If you have further questions or answers about block scheduling, please e-mail us at freem013@tc.umn.edu, or join BlockList

Successfully Implementing Block Scheduling:

Will the parents and community support the 4-period schedule?  Schools thinking of changing should engage the parent and community in discussion of the change from the beginning. There may be some detractors because this is not how school was when parents were there. When the advantages and disadvantages are explored openly, parents and community members can be strong allies.

What if this schedule doesn't work? The board has voted that the program will go for at least 4 years. However, throughout the process of restructuring, evaluation will be a key component. Any schedule we try will be subject to evaluation which could lead to modification.

Staff Development:

I can't lecture for 92 minutes. Staff is being encouraged to explore a variety of instructional methods. Research indicates that many methods of instruction are more effective than lecture. In-services and resources will be provided to introduce specific techniques that you can utilize in your class room. We have staff members willing to share their expertise and experiences with you, and paid writing time has been requested for the development of creative classroom activities/instructional strategies.

NOTE: See the Staff Development resource page.

Instructional Methods:

Can students survive a class that lasts 85 minutes or more? Won't they become bored and tune out? This would be true if teachers only lecture, but a longer period "kills the lecture method." Students say the schedule has forced the teachers to become more creative in the classroom. (Willis, p. 3) Because the longer period facilitates more engaging teaching techniques, students and teachers should find the day goes faster.

Will instructional methods have to change? If a teacher is lecturing for an entire period under a 7-period day schedule, something will have to change. Teachers should be encouraged and supported in exploring a variety of instructional methods. Research indicates that many methods of instruction are more effective than lecture. In-services and resources should be provided to introduce specific techniques that can be utilized in the classroom. Schools have a significant number of staff members whose expertise in this area can be tapped.

How does an 85 minute block help those in lab-oriented classes, technology, art, physical education classes? Half as much time is consumed in showering and dressing, setting up experiments and taking them down, and cleaning up areas. All in one class period an activity can be introduced with a demonstration, the lab activity completed by the students, and the results of the lab discussed. In addition, tapping community resources for field trips or activities such as bowling and environmental observation is now more feasible.

Won't we have less instructional time under this block plan than we have with the present traditional schedule? No. Under the traditional plan, a two semester course meets 180 days in 50 minute periods for a total of 9000 minutes of instruction time. Under the proposal block, this class would meet 90 days in 92 minute classes for a total of 8100 minutes of instructional time. Remember, however, that by combining the course into one semester, we are reducing by 50% the time used for administrative functions. Opening and closure time may also be reduced. If we conservatively use ten minutes daily for such administrative activities, we consume 1800 minutes (180 days x 10 minutes) under a traditional schedule and 900 minutes (90 days x 10 minutes) under the block system. You thus have 7200 minutes of instruction time for introduction of new materials/ concepts/activities in either schedule (9000-1800=7200 minutes under traditional schedule and 8100-900=7200 under the block schedule.

Curriculum:

Because there may be long gaps of time between a student's courses in the same subject--math, for example--won't students forget too much content in the interim? Material is taught more thoroughly in longer blocks. South St. Paul High School found no evidence that students have had any significant problems with retention of materials. Carroll (1987) cited research on retention which said "students remember best that which they really understand and can apply; concentration of attention, and more immediate, concentrated feedback provides powerful reinforcement." (Carroll, 1987, p. 11) Carroll asserts that "retention has not been a problem when the Copernican Plan has been put into practice." (Willis, p. 3) Other anecdotal evidence is that though students with a longer gap between courses may need to catch up at the start of a term, the longer, concentrated class periods greatly shortens the catch-up time.

Does the schedule hurt departments with elective courses? No, it helps because more courses are offered during the year in a 4-period day schedule, such as Schedule 1 above.

Won't students graduate early instead of taking extra classes? Experience is that students don't choose to graduate early because they come to school for the school activities and their friends. Most students choose to take more elective and/or more advanced classes.

Other Questions:

Don't students who transfer from schools operating under traditional 6- or 7-period day schedules have a difficult transition? Transfer in and out can be somewhat difficult, particularly in setting up a schedule for students, and different transition procedures must be developed. Credit conversion can be worked out; it is not insurmountable. An advantage for transfer students may be that they can get a fresh start at the semester and even at mid-semester in courses which earn a semester credit in one quarter.

Don't students, when returning from absences, have more difficulty making up ninety minutes than traditional 55 minutes? They may, but they only have 3 or 4 classes to make up. Students should come to feel that good attendance in each class is more important. For those students who are chronically absent, teachers and administrators will be able to intervene much sooner. It can also be viewed from another point of view--when students attend class, they are in effect attending two classes.In South St. Paul, counselors work with transfer students in doing their best to match incoming credits with our course offerings. Enrollment in one term elective blocks is used versus two term block courses when possible.

Can money be saved on textbooks if students are not all taking the same classes at the same time? If the same courses are evenly spread throughout the year, the amount of money needed for textbooks decreases. Schools have found, however, that the amount of money used for film rental and video software increases. Teachers are able to more effectively use some of the high quality films and videos during the longer period.

Won't there be an impact on basic skills by compressing a two semester course into only one semester? We certainly hope so. We believe this system will provide quality time for instruction. With smaller classes and fewer overall numbers of students each:h semester all teachers once again can focus on written assignments, essays, and individual feedback. We will now have time to grade papers (90 opposed to 150). We will now have time to focus on those students who need individual assistance. Immersion in curriculum is validated by research.

Won't this schedule hurt those departments with a program that is basically elective courses? On the contrary. Students now have more options to take more classes. We can not only continue to offer the program we had under a traditional schedule. we can now expand our course offering. Elective departments should benefit from this change.

What happens to a student who is obviously going to fail? Does that student stay in a class for a full term when there is no hope of passing? We have always required the students to remain in the class and unless it would create a real problem they would stay in the class here also.

How would this effect graduation requirements? Every class will be counted as a credit - 16 possible each year. Total of 64 possible by graduation. We will require 56 by 1999. Proposed requirements are posted upon board approval.

Can you explain the advisor/advisee block in South St. Paul? A number of students will be assigned an advisor and that group will meet weekly during the advisor/advisee block. Activities such as meetings, assemblies, and tutoring will be conducted during this time.

 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on September 17, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on September 17, 2009