Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREIBlock Scheduling

What's inside.

Primer and FAQ

Schools

Discussion

Research & Resources

Project Home

Other resources

CAREI Home

College of Education and Human Development

University of Minnesota

Block Sceduling Logo

 

 

 

freem013@umn.edu
CAREI - Block Scheduling
University of Minnesota
360 Education Sciences Building
56 East River Road
Minneapolis, MN
55455-0364 USA
Tel: 612-625-6541
Fax: 612-625-3086

 

CAREI > Current Projects > Block Scheduling

Research & Resources - Kansas Statewide Study

Full report (in print friendly versions)

The Effect of Block Scheduling on Mathematics Achievement in High and Low SES Secondary Schools

by Glenn R. Walker

Submitted to the Department of Teaching and Leadership and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.  Dissertation defended: July, 2000

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effects of block scheduling on math achievement of secondary students in Kansas. The results of the Kansas State Mathematics Assessment were analyzed for all 345 public secondary schools, approximately 150,000 10th graders, for the years 1994-1999. This data was disaggregated by type of schedule, block or traditional; years on the block; days per week on the block; size of school; teacher-pupil ratio, and socio-economic level of the schools considered. 

Ten research questions were answered in this study. ANOVAs were calculated for seven of the questions. Correlations were calculated for the two questions which considered the effects of pupil-teacher ratio and socio-economic status. A regression analysis was calculated for one question considering the effects of block scheduling when all other factors were controlled. Overall gain for all schools was found to be significant for the five-year period. The gain for block-scheduled schools was found to be slightly greater than that of traditionally scheduled schools but that difference was found to be insignificant. Also found to be insignificant were the effects of years on the block and days per week on the block. The effect of size of school was found to be significant but the data presented challenging results, which prompted other questions. Pupil-teacher ratio was found to have a small but significant effect. Socio-economic status was found to be the single most important factor in achievement results, regardless of schedule type.
The findings indicate that block scheduled schools have improved math achievement at a rate at least equal to schools with traditional schedules. This should allay the fears of some administrators and math teachers as they contemplate schedule changes. This study did not find that the number of years on the block or the number of days per week on the block greatly affected achievement. While size of school did seem to have an effect, further analysis indicates that this finding had more to do with pupil-teacher ratio and socio-economic status than school size.

 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on September 17, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on September 17, 2009