Rather Than Fixing Kids, Transform the Environment with Tribes Learning
Communities
By Jeanne Gibbs, Chief Visionary Officer, CenterSource Systems,
Sausalito, California
|
Picture a child, who because of environmental
conditions at home, speaks only in a whisper and looks at the ground
cowering when spoken to by an adult. Now picture this child smiling,
laughing, eagerly sharing a favorite experience with classmates in a
Community Circle. Notice a young man who enters the classroom with a
sense of wildness, anger and bewilderment. . . a young man who
lashes out at teacher and peers alike. Now watch his tears as he
talks about facing an upcoming four day weekend. He doesn’t want to
leave the classroom, a place where he feels safe, accepted and loved
by all.
–Report from a 3rd grade teacher, Cathy Allen,
Bountiful, Utah |
These two students, one dropping out and one acting out, are fortunate to
be in Cathy Allen’s classroom. Her room is a caring environment in which all
kids thrive—all gaining a sense of competence; none feeling lost.
This school, like thousands of others throughout the United States and
Canada, has become a Learning Community using the community building and
peer leadership process known simply as Tribes. This school has shifted its
focus from adding one more promising curriculum or another set of behavior
rules to building a culture of caring throughout the school. It is an
environment designed to meet everyone’s basic human needs: belonging,
continuity, connection to others and to ideas and values that make our lives
meaningful and significant (Sergiovanni, 1994, p.xiii). Could it be that
John Dewey’s words, unheeded for more than 80 years, ago are leading us now?
Dewey urged that each public school be a model home, a complete community.
Students, staff and parents would be energized by a shared vision, realistic
developmental goals, and caring ways for people to be and learn together.
Today, more likely than not, Dewey’s school would be one of the thousands
using the systemic peer leadership process of Tribes to re build their
school system’s culture.
Consider what would have happened to Cathy Allen’s students in a school
still using a traditional "control-the-kids" teacher-talk approach. Had the
behaviors of the two young people continued, they would have been diagnosed
and labeled as having learning problems. In time their own self-confirming
images would have sentenced them to tracks of failure, ultimately to be
counted in the statistics on low achievement, school drop-out, drug use,
youth violence, alienation and despair. Massive categorical funding is
allocated year after year to "fix kids"—fix them by initiating more programs
for individual treatment, behavioral controls, pull-out strategies, special
education and various costly remedial programs. This traditional focus
continues to drive legislation and funding in spite of the growing agreement
among researchers and educators that attempting to "fix kids" is
overwhelming our schools.
Two refreshing paradigms give us a blinding glimpse of the obvious:
-
Rather than fixing kids, fix the
environments in the systems contributing to and sustaining their
problems;
-
Rather than diagnosing and labeling
weaknesses, involve teachers, parents, and students in identifying,
appreciating and celebrating each young person’s strengths and
importance as a resource to others.
The Transformational Environment
We no longer have to guess how to go about building caring systems that
will transform the lives of children like those we met at the beginning
of this article. We have only to look at several decades of two
compelling bodies of educational research: the long-term developmental
studies of resilience and the more than one thousand studies on
cooperative learning. The former identify what components must be
present in child rearing systems (whether school, family, peer or
community groups) if youth are to succeed; and the latter studies tell
us how to create and sustain the essential components within learning
systems. Our respected colleague, Bonnie Benard, has given the field of youth
development and education a significant framework by synthesizing the
impressive longitudinal studies on resilience. We only have to ask
ourselves, What if every school community recognized that a child’s
daily environment is the primary predictor of success or failure? What
if all school site councils learned that in spite of serious, high risk
life circumstances, a majority of children would succeed in life if our
schools would established a supportive, caring environment for growth
and learning?
The protective factors as proven by years of research and defined by
Benard fall into three succinct categories. A child’s capacity to
overcome deprivation and adverse life conditions becomes a reality when
systems foster:
Caring and supportive relationships – Caring relationships
within systems convey compassion, understanding and respect. They are
grounded in attentive listening, safety and basic trust.
Positive and high expectations – High expectations communicate
firm guidance, structure and challenge, and most importantly, convey a
belief in a young person’s innate resilience. They highlight strengths
and assets as opposed to problems and deficits.
Opportunities for meaningful participation – Opportunities for
meaningful participation (leadership and contribution to the community)
may be actualized through decision making, listening and being heard,
with each person being included with valued responsibilities. (Benard,
1991) It is no surprise that these protective processes work. They meet
our basic human needs for love and belonging; for respect, challenge,
and structure; and for meaningful involvement, power and ultimately,
meaning. In other words, they meet our human need to be included and to
be of value to a community.
Cultures containing these components assure the development of
physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and moral competence (Werner and
Smith, 1992). High school graduations in school communities that create
and sustain an environment rich in protective factors would celebrate
the development of social and moral competence as well as cognitive and
physical competency in their graduates. As predicted by longitudinal
studies, students would have developed the life-long abilities of. . .
-
social competence: responsiveness,
cultural flexibility, empathy, caring, communication skills, and a
sense of humor
-
problem-solving: planning, help-seeking,
critical and creative thinking
-
autonomy: a sense of identity,
self-efficacy, self-awareness, task-mastery, and adaptive distancing
from negative messages and conditions; and
-
a sense of purpose with belief in a bright
future: goal direction, educational aspirations, optimism, meaning,
and spiritual connectedness (Benard, 1991).
The Community Building Process
How can we bring this about for all students? Educators throughout
thousands of school communities in the United States, Canada and
Australia now are using the Tribes Learning Community (Tribes TLCh)
process to establish caring systems for human development. Developed
over 20 years ago to prevent youth problems through the use of positive
peer groups, the Tribes approach draws upon research to incorporate
studies on cooperative learning, group process, brain-compatible
learning, multiple intelligence, thematic instruction, conflict
resolution and interactive teaching methods. Tribes is a process—not
just a curriculum or a set of group activities. It is a step-by-step
sequence of appropriate strategies to attain our goal of youth
development. The caring process becomes an on-going culture within the
school because it is facilitated and monitored by students within peer
groups (tribes). The culture is transformational for learning and
development. It makes kindness, respect for diversity and social support
a reality throughout the school.
| The stated mission of Tribes is:
To assure the healthy development of every
child so that each has the knowledge, skills and resiliency to
be successful in a rapidly changing world. |
This ambitious mission can be systematically achieved as the school
community engages all teachers, administrators, students, and families
in working together as a learning community dedicated to caring and
support, active participation and positive expectations for all
students. (Gibbs, 1995, p. 22). The Tribes systems approach creates long-term mini-communities (tribes:
small groups of 4-6 members) parents in classroom groups, teachers in
faculty groups, students in cooperative learning tribes. The
decentralized structure provides energy and inclusion within any group
of peers no matter the age, culture or stage of development.
Appreciation for each person’s uniqueness (race, culture, gender,
abilities and contributions) is assured within the tribes. A parent from
Ontario, Canada, wrote:
"When I first realized that the Tribes process would be an integral
part of my son’s education, I was intrigued by the concept of
cooperative learning, but plagued by the typical doubts associated with
group learning. However, during the times that I have been involved with
the classroom activities, I have been quite impressed with the Tribes
approach. The students are learning so much more than just the required
task at hand. To listen to one another, to help each other, to express
oneself, to compromise, to look for the good in others and in oneself. .
. these are concepts which are constantly reinforced and the tools that
will prove invaluable throughout life."
The sense of community that all age groups seem to seek today becomes a
reality as people work together on meaningful goals, tasks and
challenges. The strength of the process evolves out of the special
quality time that is spent to build inclusion whenever the groups come
together. No one is isolated, no one fears to talk or ask questions in
the midst of the caring groups.
A central concept of Tribes is that anyone who does not feel included
in a group (staff, family or organization) will gain inclusion
(attention) by asserting influence (acting out or dropping out). Those
two young students mentioned early in this article were doing just that,
and would continue to do so if it were not for the culture of their
classroom. This is why schools report a 75-85 percent decrease in
discipline problems within the first six months of using the Tribes
process in classrooms. It explains why teachers report having more time
to teach now that they are not busy managing disruptive behavior.
The use of cooperative learning groups can be difficult unless people
learn how to get along—to work well together. Renown researchers David
and Roger Johnson warn educators against placing socially unskilled
students in a learning group and then telling them to cooperate.
Students must be taught the social skills needed for collaboration and
then be motivated to use them (Yager, Johnson and Johnson 1985). The
Tribes TLCh community building process teaches twelve essential
collaborative skills and transfers the responsibility to students to
help each other honor four positive agreements: attentive listening,
appreciation/no put-downs, the right to pass, and mutual respect.
Every lesson in a Tribes classroom has two objectives: the academic
content to be learned and the collaborative social skill to be
practiced. Each lesson begins with the teacher announcing the objectives
to the students, and concludes with the tribes assessing the extent to
which they achieved the objectives while working together. Often
students themselves help to decide what content and skills they want to
learn or practice together. If indeed we want to improve academic test
scores, teachers need to learn how to transfer leadership and individual
accountability to peer groups. Studies prove that group interdependence
consistently increases student achievement more than control methods
(Stevens and Slavin, 1995, p. 323). Inclusion and safety within Tribe
groups takes peer leadership and responsibility to exciting new levels
of learning and development.
The Tribes philosophy and methodology is premised on the power of
healthy peer groups to connect, to heal, and to give voice to give voice
to the disempowered. Over the many years of working in this field, my
head and heart have become convinced that ultimately "our work is not
about a curriculum or a teaching method. . . it is about nurturing the
human spirit with love (Miller,1990)." The many problems of
youth—alienation, violence, drug abuse, gangs, dropping out, suicide,
delinquency and despair—will never decrease until school, family and
community include youth as leaders in building systems that work for
kids. We need to envelop all children and youth in unbounded inclusion
and respect. Acting out and dropping out are signs that we have failed
to meet their basic human need for community.
Yet as one Tribes principal states, "Whatever we want to have happen
for kids first has to happen for the staff of a school, so that we can
model the skills and behaviors we want students to learn." (Gibbs, 1995,
p. 200) School personnel like all human beings, long for inclusion,
respect, and supportive relationships with peers. They too will tap
their innate capacity for resilience—for motivation and learning,
engagement, empathy, insight, creativity, optimism, and change—when
their school systems become a culture of caring. The good news is that a
growing number of educators and school boards are recognizing that while
other reforms may be needed, better learning for more children
ultimately relies on the competency and collegiality of the teachers
within the school. Tribes Professional Development leads the way,
(Gibbs, 1998).
Judi Fenton, Principal in a Whidbey Island School in Washington,
believes that every member of her staff feels supported 100 percent of
the time. Judi says, "Without this caring support as a foundation, we
could not go nearly as far academically. I’ve never seen people who were
more closely bonded or more caring than in this school." (The poem "Safe
Place," which concludes this article, was written by a teacher who is
also appreciative of the staff environment within his school.)
The connection between cultures of caring and academic excellence can
be observed from preschool to university classrooms. I was particularly
impressed one very cold day visiting a high school an hour’s drive out
of Oshawa, Ontario. Deep in the blizzard, the warmth of the school was
symbolic of the learning environment in Gloria Woodside’s senior
economics class. Eighteen young people, heads together in five groups,
analyzed the implications of cut-backs in different sections of the
Canadian National budget. Discussions in each tribe were animated and
intense. Mrs. Woodside asked each group to select a member to present
the group’s viewpoint in a panel discussion. The first student protested
any cuts to transportation services. "But," said another, "maintaining
the level of national health services is more important than new roads."
The debate continued: "Our study group is unwilling to have education
set back due to other priorities." The students drew upon information
gained from government documents, newspaper articles and their
perspective on political pressures. The rest of the class was rapt with
attention, and after twenty minutes I realized the students no longer
were just involved in a discussion in front of their class. They were
weighing the implications to their own lives, their province, town and
families. It was democracy made real, young citizens getting ready to
influence the directions of their country.
The blizzard subsided and the sun sparkled over the shining fields as
we drove back to the city. I realized that this is what it is all about.
Caring community environments give us a way not only to support human
learning and resilience, but perhaps our only path to creating future
compassionate citizens capable of leading the democratic communities in
which most of us long to live.
References
Benard, B. Fostering Resiliency in Kids: Protective Factors in the
Family, School, and Community, Portland, OR: Northwest Regional,
1991.
Dewey, J. Democracy in Education, New York: Macmillan, 1916.
Fullen, M. Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform,
New York: Palmer Press, 1993.
Gibbs, J. Tribes, A New Way of Learning and Being Together,
Sausalito, CA: CenterSystem, LLC, 1995.
Gibbs, J. Guiding Your School Community to Live a Culture of Caring
and Learning, Sausalito, CA: CenterSystem, LLC, 1998.
Sergiovanni, T. Building Community in Schools, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 1994.
|