Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREIResearch Practice Newsletter Archive

Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI)
275 Peik Hall - 159 Pillsbury Dr. SE - Minneapolis MN 55455
Tel: 612-624-0300 - Fax: 612-625-3086

What's inside.

Volume 7, Number 1

In this issue:

From the Director:
Standards-Based Education in Minnesota

Local Systemic Change Initiatives in Science and Mathematics

Educational Technology: A Valuable Support for Standards-based Science and Math Education Reform

Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: Helping Students Make Connections

Museums: They're Not Just for Field Trips Anymore

 

 

CAREI > Research/Practice Newsletter

Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: Helping Students Make Connections

Terry Wyberg, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, University of Minnesota

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 1989) recommend that high school students should be able to do the following: "represent and analyze relationships using tables, verbal rules, equations, and graphs; translate among tabular, symbolic, and graphical representations of functions; recognize that a variety of problem situations can be modeled by the same type of function; and analyze the effects of parameter changes on the graphs of functions" (p. 154). The teaching of functions by emphasizing the tabular, symbolic and graphical representations and the connections between them became known as "The Rule of Three." Functions can also be represented by real-world situations themselves so "The Rule of Three" later was called by some as "The Rule of Four". These representations should not be learned in isolation and that true learning of the concept of function occurs when a person can easily make connections between the various representations and see how changes in one representation effects the other three.

One of the most widely used tools in the mathematics classroom is the graphing calculator. Most graphing calculators currently available have the capability to represent mathematical situations graphically, symbolically, and as a table of values. The real power of the graphing calculator is that the user can enter one representation and easily switch to the other two. An example of an activity that emphasizes the translations between representations is given below. This activity is also used to demonstrate how communication in the classroom can be enhanced when students have access to graphing calculators. Conversations during this activity should be focused on making sense of the translations between representations and it will be the students that will be doing the explaining of their reasoning rather than the teacher explaining some rules to be followed.

The Problem (Real-World Representation)

According to standardized growth and development charts used by many American pediatricians, the median weight for girls during their first six months of life increases at an almost constant rate. Starting at 7.0 lbs. at birth, for each additional month of life the female median weight increases by 1.5 lbs. (Kime, 1997)

The problem given above is a real-world representation of a linear function. Students are next asked to generate a table of values that show the relationship between age and median weight for the first six months of age and enter this information in the graphing calculator. Figure A is the display of a Texas Instruments TI-83 graphing calculator after a student has entered the data. The L1 column is the ages in months and the L2 column is the median weight for girls in pounds.

Figure A: Tabular Representation Figure B: Graphical Respresentation

Once the table of values has been entered in the calculator the graphical representation or scatter-plot can be displayed (Figure B) by pushing a few buttons. The horizontal axis is the ages in months and the vertical axis is the median weight in pounds.

Most students notice that the dots lie in a straight line. Many students make sense of this by either referring to the table or the real-world situation. The comments that students make during this part of the lesson are typically about the translations between representations rather than of the representations themselves. Students are also explaining their reasoning to other students and to the teacher.

Figure C: Symbolic Representations Figure D: Graphical Representation

Note that students studying linear functions can and should be able to do this first part of this activity without the use of a graphing calculator. The next part of the activity is where the use of a graphing calculator is essential.

Students are asked to enter a function (symbolic representation) of the form y = mx + b, for example y = 5x + 2, into their calculator as shown in Figure C. The corresponding graphical representation is shown in Figure D. The goal for the students is to change the values of the m and b so that the line passes through all the points on the scatter-plot. The focus of this part of the activity is on the connection between symbolic and graphical representations and on the effects of parameter changes on the graphical representation. Students usually find the equation that fits, y = 1.5x + 7, in a short amount of time. The discussion that takes place during this part of the activity usually connects the symbolic representation y = 1.5x + 7 and the real-world situation. Students notice that the 1.5 is the same as the 1.5 lbs. increase per month and this creates an opportunity to discuss slope and average rate of change. The 7 corresponds to the initial weight of 7 lbs. and there becomes and opportunity to discuss the y-intercept. One of the purposes of this article is to emphasize how the communication between the students and the teacher is changing in a classroom. First, the content of the communication is on making connections between representations rather than just on the representations themselves. Second, it is the students who are explaining rather than the teacher. The teacher's role is that of a facilitator of knowledge rather than an information dispenser.

References

Kime, L. A., Clark, J (1997). Explorations in College Algebra. John Wiley & Sons.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1998). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Discussion Draft. Reston, Va.: NCTM.

 

 

 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on September 17, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on September 17, 2009