Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREICenter for Applied Research and Educational Improvement

Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI)
360 Education Sciences Building - 56 East River Road - Minneapolis MN 55455
Tel: 612-624-0300 - Fax: 612-625-3086

What's inside.

About CAREI

Current Projects

Archived Reports

Archived Research/ Practice newsletters

Assembly Member School Districts

Helpful Links

Search

Staff Directory

CAREI Home

careiweb@umn.edu

New address:
Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI)

University of Minnesota
1954 Buford Avenue, Suite 425
St. Paul, MN 55108-1062
USA
Tel: 612-624-0300
Fax: 612-625-3086

 

 

CAREI > Archived Reports

Archived Reports with Summary

Analysis of College in the Schools (CIS) Surveys (August 2004)

The College in the Schools (CIS) program delivers introductory-level University of Minnesota courses to high school junior and senior students in their local high schools. These courses are taught by their high school teachers and are a means of providing advanced curriculum to those students who are ready for highly challenging content. The survey asked about participants’ experiences after high school including whether they attended college, whether the University credit received was recognized at their college, and how CIS did or did not prepare them for college. These are survey results and analysis of the CIS program.

Executive summary and analysis (in print/save friendly versions)

Executive Summary

Impact Survey Analysis

Follow-up Survey Analysis

21st Century Community Learning Centers: Pathways to Progress, Saint Paul Public Schools - Final Evaluation Report (March 2004)

Pathways to Progress is a three year, federally funded grant that establishes community learning centers at each of the eight Saint Paul Public School sites. These community learning centers are designed to provide coordinated expanded day and year community learning activities for students, families and community members in Saint Paul.

Final Report (in print/save friendly version)

Leadership for Literacy Grant: Evaluation Report (Summer 2002)

The Leadership for Literacy Grant, competitively awarded to Minnesota School District 622, has had a goal of building leadership for literacy through the design and implementation of professional learning communities. Grant resources provided for a set of activities, which were designed to foster a collaborative culture in the district among teachers and staff.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Differentiating the Curriculum: What Difference Does it Make? (AERA April 2002)

This randomized experiment at the middle school level examined the differential effects of the "one-size-fits-all" approach to instruction and the instructional practice of differentiating the task so the "task fits individual" in a teacher-assigned and a student-chosen condition. The study examined the effects of these three conditions on a variety of achievement and reasoning behaviors for students of various skill levels.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Enhancing the Valuing of and Commitment to Effortful Achievement: An Achievement Goal Approach (AERA April 2002)

This study conducted in a field context at the middle-school level investigated the effects of task differentiation and the task assignment process on the co-variance of effort and achievement outcome and the differential emphasis that students place on ability and effort in explaining the causes of their achievement.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Mott Foundation:  Use of Continuous Improvement and Evaluation in Before- and After-School Programs (2001)

This study, supported with funding from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, is intended to provide "quick turnaround" information to inform the future direction of the Foundation related to building the capacity of after-school programs to engage in evaluation / continuous improvement (CI) efforts to promote program improvement.

Reports (in print/save friendly versions)

  • Final Report 2001
  • Appendix A
  • Appendix B
  • Appendix C

School Start Time Study (1998-2001)

Effective with the 1997-98 school year, the Minneapolis School District changed the starting time of its seven comprehensive high schools to 8:40 AM. and the dismissal time to 3:20 PM. Prior to the change, classes began at the high schools at 7:15 AM and dismissed at 1:45 PM. In the 1997-98 school year, the Center for Applied Research (CAREI) in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Minnesota was asked by the Minneapolis School Board to examine the impact of the later start upon its students, staff, families, and community members. The information from that study can be found in "Start Time Study Report of Findings," November 1998, as a bound report provided to Minneapolis School District administrators.

Reports (in print/save friendly versions)

  • 2001 Executive Summary
  • 1998 Executive Summary
  • Full Report Volume I
  • Full Report Volume II

Changing Times: Findings From the First Longitudinal Study of Later High School Start Times [PDF] (from NASSP Bulletin - Vol. 86 No. 633 December 2002. Available in PDF format only.) by Kyla Wahlstrom

Seven Topics in Education: A Review of the Literature for School District 112 (December 2001)

Changes of every sort pose significant challenges to school districts today. It seems each day we are confronted with a new set of concerns, which force us to ponder again the best approach to schooling. Schools today, for instance, are under pressure from all sides to be fiscally efficient, rigorously accountable for student outcomes, and technologically advanced; while at the same time we demand that those schools be safer, more nurturing and also beautifully designed. These elements need not be mutually exclusive - that is to say - they may co-exist. The challenge for decision makers is to strike that perfect balance of benefits, both short and long term, with costs. This document is aimed at addressing seven topic areas in education. It is hoped that the document will stimulate questions, encourage discussion, and provide some guidance for decision making.
Evaluation Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Blocking the School Schedule: Potential for Instructional Change (UCEA November 2001)

For seven years, researchers at the Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI), College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, have been conducting evaluations of block scheduling for school districts across Minnesota and Wisconsin. Thirty-six high schools and 14 middle/junior high schools have requested some or all of the following evaluation methods: teacher, student, or parent surveys; classroom observation; or focus groups of teachers, students, or parents.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Dissemination With Impact: What Research Suggests for Practice in Career and Technical Education  (September 2001)

The purpose of this review is to examine what we know about dissemination, based on both the literature that refers specifically to Career and Technical Education (CTE), and that which is drawn from education and related fields. Ricketts' (1982) literature review indicated that research on the dissemination of vocational education products was "slightly negative to strongly negative," and that "The understanding of dissemination's role in the process of innovation and change is much too weak" (3). After reviewing the published literature in the field, it appears that his assessment of nearly two decades ago cannot be easily challenged. Thus, our purpose is to introduce dilemmas that may advance the CTE dissemination field rather than to validate current "best practice."

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

21st Century Community Learning Centers: Pathways to Progress Project, Saint Paul Public Schools (Fall 2001)

Pathways to Progress is a three year, federally funded grant that establishes community learning centers at each of the eight Saint Paul Public School sites. These community learning centers are designed to provide coordinated expanded day and year community learning activities for students, families and community members in Saint Paul.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

The Role of Professional Learning Communities In International Education (July 2001)

This paper examines five questions that possess theoretical and empirical significance for educational leaders who are asked to create learning cultures among teachers in their school: 1). What is a professional learning community? 2). What is its importance to school improvement efforts? 3). What is its relevance to international education at this time in history? 4). What are the inherent tensions involved in its development? And 5). What role can leaders play to manage these tensions?

It's OK to be Stupid: Contributions Professional Community Makes to Exemplary Technology Use

Framework and Methodology for The Exemplary Technology-Supported-Schooling Case Studies Project

Sustainability and Transferability of Instructional Reforms

New Teacher and Student Roles in the Technology-Supported Classroom

Teachers' Professional Development For Vital Middle Schools: What Do We Know And Where Should We Go? (2001)

Over the last decade the challenges to educators, both from within and outside the profession, have been numerous and often conflicting. Much of the time the difficulties appear overwhelming, as schools are confronted with seemingly endless challenges such as changing demographics, a sense that student engagement and faith in education is declining, and problems of attracting and retaining high quality faculty and administrators to work in an embattled professional setting.

In this paper I will argue that we have lapsed into constrained, but easy, thinking about how to make middle schools a reality through teacher development. This has occurred not because the specific goals are wrong, or even the short-term strategies, but because we have not considered all of the larger implications.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Linking Authentic Instruction to Students' Achievement Using Peer Coaching, Evaluation Report (Summer 2001)

In an effort to improve teaching and learning and to assist teachers in implementing the graduation standards, the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning sponsored a project called Linking Authentic Instruction, which provided a group of predominantly secondary social studies teachers in the Minneapolis School District the opportunity to participate in a series of professional development seminars.

The goals of the seminars were for teachers to be able to: 1) Translate the theoretical framework that links the Minnesota High Standards and authentic pedagogy (instruction and assessment) into practice; 2) Create peer-coaching teams to embed the authentic instruction criteria into daily practice at each participating site; 3) Implement model lessons and score their own students' work. This report is a result of an evaluation done to answer these questions.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Monarch Monitoring: A Teacher/Student/Scientist Research Project

The Monarch Monitoring Project was a field research experience designed to enhance the capacity of middle and high school teachers to incorporate active research into classroom teaching. Active research was defined as students involved in formulating questions and/or designing research protocol, collecting and interpreting data, and reporting results.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Case Studies

SciMathMN - Charting a New Course: A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Curricula in Eight Minnesota School Districts (Fall 2001)

Across the state of Minnesota, school districts have adopted a variety of new mathematics curricula developed in the 1990s with the support of the National Science Foundation. As of spring 2000, more than 100 districts in Minnesota were using one of these standards-based curricula at the elementary, middle and/or high school levels. This is the final report of the multi-year study of implementation and impact of standards-based curricula in Minnesota in several district settings.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Education Minnesota's TALL Project: Teachers as Learners and Leaders Second Annual Evaluation Report (July 2002)

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Education Minnesota's TALL Project: Teachers as Learners and Leaders (July, 2001)

The Legislature has provided assistance in the form of categorical aid for staff development. State law requires school districts to set aside two percent of their basic revenue for staff development.  During the 2000 session, the Legislature allocated money to the Department of Children, Families, and Learning (CFL) for a number of Best Practice grants. One of these Best Practice grants was earmarked for Education Minnesota. This grant became the Teachers as Learners and Leaders (TALL) project.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Alternative Calendars: Final Report by the Working Group (February 1999)

This report from a working group convened by the Minnesota Department of Children, Families & Learning examines evidence on the educational and fiscal outcomes of year-round education and issues encountered in implementing year-round educational programs in Minnesota.

1997-98 Extended Learning and Year-Round Program in Six Districts: An Overview (February 1999)

In 1995, the Minnesota Legislature began allocating funding to promote year-round and extended day, week, and year programs. This report describes the nature of the programs offered during 1997-98 school year and their related outcomes. Profiles for each program are located in the appendices.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Year-Round Education (November 1998)

In an effort to inform activities and policies related to recent Minnesota legislation on alternative school calendars, this article provides a comprehensive and updated review of the literature and research on effective models of year-round education.1 It begins with an overview of the legislation, followed by a description of the various models of year-round education (YRE) being implemented nationwide, a discussion of the perceived advantages and disadvantages of these alternative calendars, a review of research on the effects of YRE on student achievement and related outcomes, and finally, a summary of key policy issues raised by YRE.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Minnesota Charter Schools Evaluation (May 1998)

An evaluation team from the University of Minnesota was selected to complete an 18-month study in February 1996 by the Minnesota State Board of Education. The evaluation was to focus on three policy questions regarding Minnesota charter schools, 1) are Minnesota charter schools doing what they were designed to do; 2) are charter schools improving student achievement; and 3) are charter schools successful? This is the interim report completed in December 1996 and presented to the Board in early 1997.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Also available online

Appendices (in print/save friendly versions)

1995-97 Legislative brief, Extended Learning and Year-Round Program in Six Districts: An Overview. (February 1998)

Beginning in 1995 the Minnesota Legislature allocated funding to promote year-round and extended day, week, and year programs. This report describes the nature of these programs and related outcomes. Profiles for each program are in the appendices.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

St. Paul Public Schools Extended Learning Programs: Evaluation Report (1997)

In 1995, the Minnesota Legislature provided funding for year-round schools and extended day, week and year programming. Such programs are viewed as a way to increase student achievement, skills, and self-confidence through more flexible use of learning time. In March of 1996, the Saint Paul Public School district enlisted the Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement to conduct an evaluation of its extended day, week and year programs.

Report (in print/save friendly versions)

Integrated Services for Children and Families - Collaborative Initiatives: A Review of the Literature (March 1996)

This review of the literature is intended for use by organizations and agencies who are working collaboratively to improve outcomes for children and families by developing integrated services in their communities. The factors outlined in this review have been identified by researchers, experienced service practitioners and organizational theorists as key components in designing, implementing and evaluating the impact of collaborative initiatives to develop integrated services. The information is organized in a framework that reflects primary areas of importance in evaluating the implementation (or processes) and impact (or outcomes) of collaborative initiatives focused on service integration.

Minnesota Educational Effectiveness: Evaluation Report (1995-96)

(Available from Dr. Kyla Wahlstrom: wahls001@umn.edu)

 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on October 28, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on October 28, 2009