Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREISSI Impact Study

What's inside.

Project Summary

Project Description

Time Line

Publications

Instruments

Bibliography

SSI Home

Resources

CAREI Home

College Home

 

CAREI > Current Projects > SSI

Time Line

A detailed timeline has been developed to help communicate the variety of tasks that need to be completed for this study. The timeline includes details ranging from the preparation and planning of the study to the final analysis and dissemination of results.

Preparation and Planning (Jan, ‘99 – Aug, ‘99)

  1. Initiation: The project would begin in January 1999 with consolidation of the team and the implementation of continuous communication procedures.
  2. Indicator Development: The first task would be an intensive literature review and analysis to translate the drivers and the science and mathematics standards into indicators and ultimately into data collection devices.
  3. Sample Identification: In spring as the theoretical grounding is proceeding, we will be working with the states to identify schools that would be sent surveys and visited during the 1999-2000 school year.
  4. Student Achievement Data: Final negotiations about how to obtain and transfer the student achievement data would take place.
  5. Instrument Finalization: During the summer there would be extensive exchanges of information and review of draft instruments among the team members. Final draft forms would then be submitted to a small group of external experts to obtain their input. Instruments would also be pilot tested with students, teachers and principals to obtain feedback and make improvements.
  6. Team Training: The finalized forms would serve as the basis for a training session with all the team members to consolidate information, procedures and understandings that would underlie the data collection effort.

Data Collection and Analyses (Sept, ’99 – Aug, ’00)

  1. Finalized Sample: Final identification of schools will take place in collaboration with the within state team members and the state’s SSI directors. Districts will be contacted and permission to conduct the survey will be obtained.
  2. Collect Survey Data: Data collection instruments would be mailed to the selected schools for completion. The presence of the within state liaisons and the prior approval of the districts involved would help to insure careful responses and optimize response rates.
  3. Site Visits: Site visit teams of one in-state and one out-state member will visit six schools in LA and MT (three with high levels of SSI interaction and three with low levels of SSI interaction) and six schools in IL (three high schools and three middle schools). The schools will be selected by the state SSI staff and/or the within state team member. Site visits would take place during the early winter and will be used to verify survey responses. In addition site visit reports on the unique characteristics of each site would be prepared by the visiting team.
  4. Data Analyses: All data would be processed into databases, cleaned and verified as soon after they were collected. A meeting of all team members to discuss data analysis and project management would take place in late spring. Student assessment information would be transferred from the state data banks in the late spring or early summer and merged with the survey, interview and observational data. The data from the three states would be analyzed and preliminary hypotheses formulated.
  5. Modifications: Any unanticipated questions or emerging theories would be incorporated into the data collection for the replication in Colorado.

Replication in Colorado (Sept, ‘00-Aug, ‘01)

1. Finalized Sample: Final identification of schools will take place in collaboration with the within state team members and the State SSI director. Districts will be contacted and permission to conduct the survey will be obtained.

  1. Collect Survey Data: Data collection instruments would be mailed to the selected schools for completion.
  2. Site Visits: Site visit teams of one instate and one out-state member will visit six schools in CO (three with high levels of SSI interaction and three with low levels of SSI interaction). The schools will be selected by the state SSI staff and/or the within state team member. Site visits would take place and site visit reports on the unique characteristics of each site would be prepared by the visiting team.
  3. Data Analyses: Data would be processed into databases, cleaned and verified. A meeting of all team members to discuss data analysis and project results would take place in late spring. Student assessment information would be transferred from the state data banks in the late spring or early summer and merged with the survey, interview and observational data. The data from the CO would be analyzed to verify findings from LA and MT.

Final Analyses and Dissemination (Sept, ‘01-Dec, ’01)

  1. Final Analyses: Final data analyses will be conducted and results translated into reports, newsletters, and monographs.
  2. Dissemination: The results of this study will be widely distributed through multiple channels including the CAREI website, professional journals, newsletters, monographs and presentations at professional meetings.
 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on September 17, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on September 17, 2009