|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Home U of MN Noyce Scholar Database
|
Theoretical FrameworkOur theoretical framework/logic model is meant to
delineate the effects of the Noyce Program and suggest other
potential influences en route to STEM majors becoming STEM
teachers in high-need schools. Also included in the model are the places en route to teaching where recruitment or retention at the program or school/district level can be assumed. Despite the potential influence of Noyce program money on STEM major decisions, this model also provides additional suggested influences from the relevant literatures. These include the impact of attributes of individual STEM majors, of the pre-service program, and of the school/district. In addition, this logic model attempts to examine the process of becoming a STEM teacher in a high-need school from the perspective of the STEM major. Presumably several factors affect STEM major choices at specific decision points such as: interests for a career, career values, career pay, and value of monetary compensation influencing whether one plans to teach; perceived importance of certification and challenge of financial cost influencing the choice to enter a certification program; desire and requirement to teach influencing whether one does teach; values for a workplace, social justice beliefs, program/funding requirements, and training influencing the decision to teach at a high-need school; and the perceived fulfillment, support, and challenge influencing the choice to remain in teaching. In sum, this model attempts to delineate the implied as well as explicitly stated experiences of STEM majors progressing toward becoming STEM teachers. |
|
Copyright 2006-07 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. This page is subject to change without notice. Last modified: 12 October, 2009. For questions or comments, contact Frances Lawrenz, at lawrenz@umn.edu |