Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota, System Wide Home Page

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

MITER College of Education and Human Development

Minnesota Interdisciplinary Training in Education Research (MITER) Program
University Technology Center 1313 SE Fifth St., Suite 118 Minneapolis, MN 55414

MITER events

2009 MITER Lectures

This year's MITER Lecture was given on February 27, 2009, by Dr. Ken Pugh (Haskins Laboratories and Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut).

Dr. Pugh is President and Director of Research at Haskins Laboratories, New Haven CT; Research Scientist in the Department of Pediatrics at the Yale University School of Medicine; and Director of the Yale Reading Center. His publications include: "Effects of stimulus difficulty and repetition on printed word identification: An fMRI comparison of non-impaired and reading disabled adolescent cohorts," 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience; "The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: Task-specific differences in functional connectivity in posterior cortex," 2000, Psychological Science, 11; and "Cerebral organization of component processes in reading," 1996, Brain, 119.

Videos

  • Brown Bag Talk (60min) “Neuroimaging Studies of Reading and Language Development: An Update on Recent Findings”

    Abstract: Our research combines several types of neuroimaging technologies with intensive behavioral testing in order to examine developmental trajectories for language and reading in both reading disabled and non-impaired cohorts. In studies of both adults and children, reading disabled readers demonstrate anomalous brain activation patterns at posterior regions in the left hemisphere during tasks that make explicit demands on phonological processing, along with, what appears to be, a compensatory reliance on frontal lobe sites and right hemisphere systems. Brain/behavior analyses have indicated that the development of reading fluency in young children is strongly associated with the development of the left hemisphere posterior reading system. Our new longitudinal project is aimed at establishing key neuro-chemical and genetic factors associated with atypical brain/behavior trajectories; initial findings will be discussed. With regard to plasticity and learning, intervention studies have examined the influence of intensive phonological remediation in young at-risk children, revealing substantial gains in both reading scores and development of these left hemisphere reading systems for children afforded this treatment. Recent extensions of our learning research with older reading-disabled readers continue to suggest a high degree of plasticity in this population.

  • Miter Lecture (1hr 59min) “Neuroimaging Research and Phonological Interventions for Struggling Readers”

Abstract: In studies of both adults and children, struggling readers demonstrate anomalous brain activation patterns at posterior regions of the left hemisphere during phonological processing tasks. Struggling readers also display what appears to be a compensatory reliance on frontal lobe sites and right hemisphere systems. Intervention studies have examined the influence of intensive phonological remediation in young at-risk children and have revealed substantial gains in both reading scores and the development of these left hemisphere reading systems for children afforded this treatment. The presentation will describe the neuroimaging research, the intensive phonological interventions, and the outcome data on the interventions.

2008 MITER Lecture

Video of session is available from the link below.

Causal Conclusions from Quasi-experimental data? presented by William Shadish, University of California, Meced
February 22, 2008

Early social experiments in the 1960s encountered significant technical and logistical problems, leading some researchers to prefer other methodologies. During the last 10 years, however, experiments have re-emerged as a more widely-used methodology. This talk will review the events that prompted this renaissance, and then examine progress in the use of several different kinds of designs: the randomized experiment, the regression discontinuity design, and the simple nonequivalent comparison group design with a pretest. For two quasi-experimental designs, empirical studies now suggest that they can provide estimates of effects that are as good as those from randomized experiments—although we still have much to learn about the conditions under which this optimistic conclusion might hold.

Contact Peggy Ferdinand, 612-626-8269 or mlif@umn.edu for more details.

 
©2008 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on April 14, 2009