Teleconference 3: April 29, 2002

Issues and Opportunities for Students with Disabilities in Technology Based Assessment

References

Baker, E.L. (1999). Technology: Something’s coming- something good. CRESST Policy Brief 2. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Baker, E.L. (2002). Design of automated authoring systems for tests. In National Research Council, Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead: Proceedings of a workshop. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

 

Bejar, I.I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In E.L. Mancall & P.G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alterative methods. Evanston, IL: The American Board of Medical Specialties.

 

Bennett, R.E. (1995). Computer-based testing for examinees with disabilities: On the road to generalized accommodation. In S. Messick (Ed.), Assessment in higher education: Issues of access, student development, and public policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bennett, R.E. (1998). Reinventing assessment: Speculations on the future of large-scale educational testing. Princeton, N.J.: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.ets.org/research/pic/bennett.html

Bennett, R.E. (1999). Using new technology to improve assessment. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 18 (3), 5-12.

Bennett, R.E. (2001). How the Internet will help large-scale assessment reinvent itself. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 9 (5). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n5.html

Bennett, R.E. (2002). An electronic infrastructure for a future generation of tests. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. & R. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bennett, R.E., Goodman, J., Hessinger, J., Ligget, J., Marshall, G., Kahn, H., & Zack, J. (1999). Using multimedia in large-scale computer-based testing programs. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 283-294.

Bloodsworth, J.G. (1993). Legibility of print. South Carolina: ERIC Accession No: ED 356494.

Bolt, D. & Crawford, R. (2000). Digital divide: Computers and our children’s future. New York: TV Books.

Bowe, F. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvey.

Brown, P.J., & Augustine, A. (2001). Screen reading software as an assessment accommodation: Implications for instruction and student performance. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, April, 2001.

Brown-Chidsey, R., & Boscardin, M.L. (1999). Computers as accessibility tools for students with and without learning disabilities. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Brown-Chidsey, R., Boscardin, M.L., & Sireci, S.G. (1999). Computer attitudes and opinions of students with and without learning disabilities. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Burk, M. (1999). Computerized test accommodations: A new approach for inclusion and success for students with disabilities. Washington, D.C.: A.U. Software, Incorporated.

Bushweller, K. (2000). Electronic exams: Throw away the No. 2 pencils – here comes computerized testing. Electronic School. June, 20-24.

Calhoon, M.B., Fuchs, L.S., & Hamlett, C.L. (2000). Effects of computer-based test accommodations on mathematics performance assessments for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 271-282.

Campbell, L.M. & Waddell, C.D. (1997). Technology-based curbcuts: How to build an accessible Web site. CAPED Communiqué, California Association on Postsecondary Education and Disability.

 

Center for Universal Design. (1997). What is Universal Design? North Carolina State University: Center for Universal Design. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.design.ncsu.edu

 

Chishold, W., Vanderheiden, G., & Jacobs, I. (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. University of Wisconsin: Trace R & D Center. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505

Chung, G.K.W.K., Baker, E.L., & Cheak, A.M. (2001). Knowledge mapper authoring system prototype. (Final deliverable to OERI). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Chung, G.K.W.K.,Klein, D.C.D., Herl, H.E., & Bewley, W. (2001). Requirements specification for a knowledge mapping authoring system. (Final deliverable to OERI). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. (1997). More than screen deep: toward every-citizen interfaces to the nation's information infrastructure. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council; National Academy Press. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/screen

 

Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers, Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley Publishing Co.

 

Dolan, R.P., & Hall, T.E. (2001). Universal design for learning: Implications for large-scale assessment. IDA Perspectives 27(4), 22-25. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?i=2518

 

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S., Hamlett, C.L., & Karns, K. (2000). Supplementing teacher judgments of mathematics test accommodations with objective data sources. School Psyhology Review, 29, 65-85.

 

Gershon, R., & Bergstrom, B. (1995). Does cheating on CAT pay: NOT! ERIC ED392844.

Gitamer, Steinbert, L.L., & Mislevy, R.J. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of troubleshooting skills in an intelligent system. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

 

Greenwood, C.R., & Rieth, H.J. (1994). Current dimensions of technology-based assessment in special education. Exceptional Children, 61(2), 105-113.

 

Goldberg, L., & O’Neill, L.M. (2000). Computer technology can empower students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Parent Magazine. (July), 72-74.

Haaf, R., Duncan, B., Skarakis-Doyle, E., Carew, M., & Kapitan, P. (1999). Computer-based language assessment software: The effects of presentation and response format. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 30, 68-74.

Haas, C,. & Hayes, J.R. (1986) What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20 (1), 22-35.

Hamilton, L. S., Klein, S. P., & Lorie, W. (2001). Using Web-based testing for large-scale assessment. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP196/IP196.pdf

Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., Harniss, M., & Almond, P. (1999). Reliability and decision consistency: An analysis of writing mode at two times on a statewide test. Educational Assessment, 6 (1), 23-40.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: author.

Kerrey, B. & Isakson, J. (2002). The power of the internet for learning: moving from promise to practice—Report of the Web-based Education Commission. Washington, D.C.: Web-based Education Commission. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://interact.hpcnet.org/webcommission/index.htm.

Lahm, E.A., & Nickels, B.L. (1999). Assistive technology competencies for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children. 32(1), 566-63.

Lewis, A. (2001). New directions in student testing and technology. APEC 2000 International Assessment Conference. Los Angeles.

Lunz, M.E., & Bergstrom, B.A. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31 (3) 251-263.

McBride, J.R. (1985). Computerized adaptive testing. Educational Leadership, 43 (2) 25-28.

Menlove, M., & Hammond, M. (1998). Meeting the demands of ADA, IDEA, and other disability legislation in the design, development, and delivery of instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 6 (1), 75-85.

Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.L., & Almond, R.G. (1999). Evidence-centered assessment design. Princeton, NH: Educational Testing Service.

Morocco, C.C., & Neuman, S.B. (1986). Word processors and the acquisition of writing strategies. Journal of Learning Disabilities 19(4), 243-248.

Mourant, Lakshmanan, & Chantadisai. (1981). Visual fatigue and cathode ray tube display factors. Human Factors, 23 (5) 529-546.

National Governor’s Association (2002). Using electronic assessment to measure student performance. Education Policy Studies Division: National Governor’s Association. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nga.org/cda/files/ELECTRONICASSESSMENT.pdf

National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessments. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2002). Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead: Proceedings of a workshop. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Newman, F. & Scurry, J. (2001). Online technology pushes pedagogy to the forefront. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (44). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://chronicle.com/weekly/v47/i44/44b00701.htm

Olson, L. (2002). Ed. dept. hints Idaho’s novel testing plan unacceptable. Education Week, 21 (21) 18,21. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://edweek.com/ew/newstory.cfm?slug=21Idaho.h21&keywords=Idaho

Ommerborn, R., & Schuemer, R. (2001). Using computers in distance study: Results of a survey amongst disabled distance students. FernUniversität – Gesamthochschule in Hagen. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/ZIFF 

Peters-Walters. S. (1998). Accessible Web site design. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(5) 42-47.

Quality Counts (2002). Building blocks for success. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.educationweek.org.

Rivera, C., Stansfield, C.W., Scialdone, L., & Sharkey, M. (2000). An analysis of state policies for the inclusion and accommodation of English language learners in state assessment programs during 1998-1999. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.

Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology 15(4). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://jset.unlv.edu/15.4/issuemenu.html

Russell, M. (2002). How computer-based technology can disrupt the technology of testing and assessment. In National Research Council, Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead: Proceedings of a workshop. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

 

Russell, M. & Haney, W. (1997). Testing writing on computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computers and via paper-and-pencil. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 5 (3). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web:http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v5n3.html

Russell M. & Haney.W. (2000). Bridging the gap between testing and technology in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(19). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web:http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n19.html

Russell, M. & Plati, T. (2001). Effects of computer versus paper administration of a state-mandated writing assessment. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.tcrecord.org

Schriver, K. (1997). Dynamics of document design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Stocking, M. (1996). Revising answers to items in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models. ETS Report Number ETS-RR-96-12. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Thompson, C. (1999). New word order: The attack of the incredible grading machine. Linguafranca, 9 (5). Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.linguafranca.com/9907/nwo.html

Thompson, S.J., Johnstone, C.J., & Thurlow, M.L. (in press). Universal design applied to large-scale assessments. (Synthesis Report 45). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Thurlow, M.L, Lazarus, S., Thompson, S.J., & Robey, J. (2001). 2001 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations. (Synthesis Report 43). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Tindal, G. & Fuchs, L.S. (1999). A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Resource Center.

Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study, Exceptional Children, 64, 439-450.

Tinker. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Trotter, A. (2001). Testing computerized exams. Education Week. 20 (37) 30-35. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=37online.h20

Vanderheiden, G. (2000). Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability. Trace Research & Development Center, Madison, WI. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/fundamental_princ_and_priority_acmcuu2000/index.htm

 

Waddell, C.D. (1997). Technology-based curbcuts for government Web sites: Making your Web site accessible. ADA Update, National League of Cities.

 

Wainer, H. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 12, 15-20.

Web Accessibility Initiative, World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.w3.org/WAI/

 

WebAIM (2001). Introduction to Web accessibility. Retrieved March, 2002, from the World Wide Web: www.webaim.org/intro/

 

Williams, S.M. (2002). Speech recognition technology and the assessment of beginning readers. In National Research Council, Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead: Proceedings of a workshop. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

 

Wissick, C.A., & Gardner, J.E. (2000). Multimedia or not to multimedia? That is the question for students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32 (4), 34-43.

These materials are excerpts from a draft NCEO report developed with support from NCS Pearson