Teleconference 13: September 25, 2006
11:30 am
Pacific, 12:30 pm Mountain, 1:30 pm Central, 2:30 pm Eastern.
1.5 hours duration.
Accommodations validity checks: What can states do to improve
assessment accommodations decision-making and to document the
fidelity of implementation on test day?
Title
I peer review letters posted on the
Department of Education Web site cite evaluation and
monitoring of accommodations use as an issue in almost half of
all states. These issues threaten the validity of assessment
results for students who need assessment accommodations in order
to show what they know. As noted in May on NCEO’s last telephone
conference, there are complex issues that affect the use of
accommodations, and state guidelines should be based
on documentation that testing accommodations do not affect valid
interpretations of the results. On this follow-up September
telephone conference, our presenters will review research on
patterns of accommodations use and make recommendations for
state policies, describe training materials that states can
adapt to their own use, and share an approach to monitoring use
of accommodations on test day. Key questions that will be
addressed include:
- Why
are issues related to accommodations training and
implementation monitoring important to the validity of test
results?
- What
training can be provided to IEP teams to improve the quality
of assessment accommodations decision-making?
- How
can districts and states monitor the fidelity of
implementation of these decisions on test day?
E-mail Rachel Quenemoen at
quene003@umn.edu with your questions, comments, and ideas
for future telephone conferences, before or after our September
25 call.
In order to get the most out of
our September 25 telephone conference, please review these
materials online, or if you prefer, download them to your
computer, or print them out. Thank you.
Note: Some
of the files below require Acrobat Reader. If you don't have
this software, go to the
Acrobat Reader Web site for a free download.
I. Materials for Teleconference 13
a. Jim Shriner’s materials:
IEP Team Decisions and Implementation
Data: Influences of IDEA 97, NCLB, and IDEIA (PowerPoint)
Project IEP-D Data Tables and Figure
(PDF)
Project PAR Data Summary Tables
(PowerPoint)
b. Sharon Hall’s materials:
Accommodations Manual: How to Select, Administer, and
Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of
Students with Disabilities (PowerPoint)
OSEP Toolkit: ASES SCASS
Accommodations Training Materials
c. Susan
Kennedy’s materials:
Connecticut Comprehensive System of
Monitoring the Use of Accommodations in Testing (PowerPoint)
Connecticut examples (print in full slide view for readability) (PowerPoint)
II. Additional Resources
May 1 Teleconference:
Investigating the Effects of Accommodations on Use of Student Scores: What
Empirical Understanding Means for NCLB Accountability Purposes
Panelists
for the September 25, 2006 Teleconference
Researcher Panelist
Jim Shriner, Associate Professor,
Department of Special Education, University of Illinois, and
Principal Investigator of the IEP Quality Improvement:
Research and Development of Web-Based Decision Support
Project.
State Panelists
Sharon Hall, Section Chief in the Division
of Special Education/Early Intervention Services, Maryland
Department of Education
Susan Kennedy, Education Manager – NCLB
Office, Connecticut Department of Education
Federal Panelists
OSEP: David Egnor and Cynthia Bryant
OESE: Sue Rigney
Co-hosts
Sandra
Warren, ASES SCASS, Council of Chief State School Officers
Rachel Quenemoen and Martha Thurlow, National Center on
Educational Outcomes
Top of page
|