
Uncovering the cognitive causes of reading
difficulty
Help for struggling readers
Reading may be the single most important skill for children to
learn—a portal to the world of knowledge. Yet a 2003 report by
the National Assessment of Educational Progress showed that more
than 37 percent of fourth-grade students, 26 percent of
eighth-grade students, and 26 percent of twelfth-grade students
read below grade level.
The percentage of struggling readers has scarcely decreased over
the last decade despite extensive research and interventions
undertaken to help them. Educational psychology professor
Paul van den
Broek and assistant professors
Kristen McMaster
and David Rapp (now at Northwestern University) set out
to reverse this trend with an innovative approach that zeroes in
on the specific cognitive challenges that can trip up struggling
readers.

An eye-tracking helmet indicates
where readers skip a word or check
back in text they read on a computer
screen.
What the research shows
Although it’s widely believed that reading-comprehension
problems happen during “online” processing, little is known
about these cognitive processes. Van den Broek and his
colleagues are among the first to connect knowledge of
psychological functioning during reading with classroom
practice.
“Despite countless efforts and approaches, so
many children are still struggling with reading,” says van den
Broek. “We believe that a thorough understanding of what these
struggling readers do during reading will lead us to
interventions that improve their specific reading process
difficulties.”
During the first year of the study,
researchers evaluated 270 students of all reading abilities in
grades four, seven, and nine and created individual cognitive
profiles. Their goal was to compare the profiles of different
groups of struggling readers with those of students who measure
average or above average in reading.
The researchers developed two original
assessments to evaluate cognitive reading processes:
A “talk-aloud” test: The student gave a
running commentary about the text as he read, helping to
identify the points at which comprehension broke down. This
assessment demonstrated that although most draw on background
knowledge as they read, one subgroup of struggling readers often
draws on information that is not relevant. Another subgroup only
sporadically refers to such background knowledge at all.
An eye-tracking test: A special helmet
allows researchers to monitor eye movement as students read text
on a computer monitor. The device can tell if the subject skips
a word, when she looks back for reference, and where she pauses
and rereads. The team discovered that readers of all levels skip
back to verify information, but struggling readers often return
to the wrong place.
The researchers spent the second year of the
study in the classroom, developing and testing interventions
specific to the cognitive profiles. The research team trained
teachers to apply interventions designed specifically for the
different subgroups of struggling readers. One of the
interventions involved peer-assisted, custom-tailored
questioning. In teams of two, students took turns reading aloud
and asking or answering predetermined questions designed to
prompt the kind of text processing that had proven problematic
for the individual.
Teachers in the study acted as consultants
and collaborators to evaluate how the various interventions
worked in practice and to assist in developing an intervention
tool kit. In the process the team confirmed that different
interventions helped different kids.
“This means that it is possible to not only
identify distinct subgroups within the broader group of
struggling readers based on their cognitive processes during
reading but that one, moreover, can design effective
interventions for each subgroup,” van den Broek explains.
What others say about this research
“Dr. van den Broek’s research that combines cognitive theory
and established educational diagnostic tools is providing an
important bridge between basic and applied research on reading
processes,” says Heather Bortfeld, assistant professor in
cognitive psychology at Texas A&M University, College Station.
“The additional use of technical tools, such as eye-tracking,
has the potential to significantly advance our understanding of
the issues underlying struggling readers’ difficulties. This is
innovative research.”
Gail Jordan, associate professor of
education and director of the reading licensure program at
Bethel University, St. Paul, Minn., says, “As both a classroom
teacher and a teacher trainer, Paul van den Broek’s research on
cognitive processes that take place during reading has given me
a deeper understanding of how readers construct meaning from
text and made me more sensitive to how my students approach the
reading task. The findings from Paul’s latest research in online
processes will give teachers much-needed targeted tools to know
how and when to support their students’ reading.”
Why this research matters
Decades of research show that when students get off to a poor
start in reading, they rarely catch up.
The National Adult Literacy Survey found that
about 44 million adults lack sufficient literacy skills to
function successfully in American society. They have difficulty
finding and keeping living-wage jobs, supporting their
children’s education, and participating actively in civic life.
“The truth is, once kids get beyond eighth
grade, it becomes very unlikely that their reading will
improve,” said van den Broek. “We have high hopes that this
research will lead to targeted interventions that will make such
grim statistics a thing of the past.”
For more information
Paul van den Broek, 612-626-1302,
pvdbroek@umn.edu
Kristen McMaster, 612-624-1859,
mcmas004@umn.edu
April 2008
Bookmark this
del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Netscape
reddit
Simpy
Spurl
StumbleUpon
Yahoo MyWeb |