Research & Resources - Resources by Topic (page 1)
General Discussion of Block Scheduling
The American Federation of Teachers
has a general description of block scheduling and a list of pros and
cons in a September 1999 publication which can be read online.
Bowman, Richard F., If Block Scheduling is the
Answer, What is the Question? Clearing House v71 n4 p242-44 Mar-Apr
1998.
Argues that block scheduling needs more research and that, in the
absence of convincing research, educators should proceed cautiously.
Black, Susan Learning on the Block. ERIC. American
School Board Journal v185 n1 p32-34 Jan 1198.
Describes how block scheduling can decrease school-day interruptions,
reduce discipline problems, and help students who need more time.
Fitzpatrick, James E.; and Mowers, Mary Success and
the Four Block Schedule: Stakeholders Buy In!
After two semesters of using the four block schedule, a Wisconsin
high school experienced academic growth, improved grades and discipline,
reduced stress, and gained a more personalized school environment.
Interested schools should gain support, create a site-level
decision-making model, demonstrate the need for change, clearly define
restructuring focus, protect teachers' jobs, visit pioneering schools,
and keep stakeholders informed.
The November 1995 issue of
Horace was "Using Time Well: Schedules in Essential Schools."
It addressed the whys of changing the high school schedule and said,
"But whether the long block offers salvation or merely this decade's
trendy placebo depends more on why than on how the day looks different.
Unless the quality of student-teacher interchanges drives the schedule,
it seems, schools will simply be putting the old wine of the
shopping-mall high school into the new bottles of long blocks" (p. 2).
Consistent with several of the nine principles of the Coalition, the
newsletter says that schools move to longer blocks when they are seeking
more depth in fewer subjects, long block make it easier for classes to
practice applying knowledge via sustained projects, and long blocks
bring down the number of students a teacher will have (at least during
each semester and possibly for the whole year), which makes it easier to
know every student well.
Howard, Elizabeth. The Trouble with Block. ERIC.
American School Board Journal v185 n1 p35-6 Jan 1998
Describes the pitfalls of block scheduling and outlines questions to
consider before implementing a block plan.
Lister, Robert J. Block Scheduling at Portsmouth High School: A
Status Report 1997.
This report is intended as a working document for the school's
faculty as they develop a comprehensive evaluation after several years
experience with block scheduling. It offers an assessment of block
scheduling and provides feedback from students, faculty, and parents. A
summary of findings in included.
Queen, J. Allen and Kaskey, Kimberley A. Steps for
Improving School Climate in Block Scheduling. Phi Delta Kappan v79 n2
p158-61 Oct 1997.
Discusses the basics of block scheduling; curricular alignment,
course development and unit design; pacing guides for time management;
instruction strategies and lesson designs; classroom management;
advanced placement and honors classes; special student populations; and
assessment.
Rettig, Michael D.; Canady, Robert Lynn All Around
the Block: Benefits and Challenges of a Non-traditional School Schedule.
ERIC. School Administrator: v53, n8 p8-14 Sep 1996.
Argues that block schedules offer many advantages, including
increased usable instructional time, increased opportunities to use
alternative instructional strategies, and fewer homework assignments and
class changes for students. Models are described. A list of resources is
provided.
Snell, Martha E., and others, Parallel Block Scheduling:
Accommodating Students' Diverse Needs in Elementary Schools. ERIC.
Journal of Early Intervention v20 n3 p265-77 Sum 1996.
This article describes the use of parallel block scheduling in
inclusive classrooms as a flexible method of scheduling that addresses
student grouping, time for teacher planning, scheduling of subjects,
support services and staff. The characteristics of PBS and an elementary
school that uses the system are highlighted.
Garber, Mary (Mindy) Glick, Parallel Block
Scheduling: A Study of Integrated Services and Funding Resulting in
Improved Student Achievement. SOURCE: Dissertation Abstracts
International, 58(07A).
This research was a qualitative study of how a school serving 800
culturally diverse students in Mesa, Arizona achieved a significant
increase in criterion-referenced test scores over four school years. The
critical findings related to instructional outcomes were:
- The principal was a change agent.
- The use of Parallel Block Scheduling (PBS) allowed for reduced
class size during reading and/or math instruction.
- The extension program provided a way to address varying needs of
students.
- Most interviewees perceived that small class size in reading
and/or math made possible by Parallel block scheduling influenced
the improved test scores.
- Fragmentation of the school day was perceived both to have
decreased and increased.
- Stigmatization decreased because all students left the room
systematically, instead of having only "pull out" students leave.
- The integration of services and funds (when permitted) provided
opportunities to use federal and state categorical funding more
effectively while meeting the intent of the laws. Recommendations
were made to continue study of issues related to the implementation
of Parallel Block Scheduling and the integration of categorical
funds.
Canady, Robert Lynn; Hotchkiss, Phyllis R.
Scheduling Practices and Policies Associated with Increased Achievement
for Low Achieving Students. ERIC (EJ320600, Clearinghouse No.UD511666).
Journal of Negro Education, v54 n3 p344-55 Sum 1985.
Presents two basic parallel block elementary school schedules
(schedules in which a block of time is scheduled for essential and/or
desired small skill groups parallel to large instructional activities).
Contends that parallel block scheduling in elementary schools can lead
to improved instructional programs for low achievers. (GC)
Achievement Gains; Class Organization; Instructional Improvement; Low
Achievement; Small Group Instruction; Time BlocksElementary
Education; Grouping (Instructional Purposes); Mathematics Instruction;
Reading Instruction
Delany, Marcia; Toburen, Laura; Hooton, Becky;
Dozier, Ann. Parallel Block Scheduling Spells Success. ERIC (No.
EJ556866, Clearinghouse No.EA534189). Educational Leadership, v55 n4
p61-63 Dec-Jan 1997-1998.
Distressed by their students' reading failure rate, teachers at two
Georgia schools developed a parallel block-scheduling plan that allows
for whole-class instruction, direct-instruction miniclasses, and
enrichment labs for all students. Success depends on matching creative,
resourceful teachers to the enrichment lab positions. Over the past two
years, standardized reading and math test scores have risen
significantly. (MLH)
Academic Achievement; Block Scheduling; Enrichment Activities; Reading
Instruction; Small ClassesElementary Education; Program Descriptions
Wilkes County School District, GA
Snell, Martha E.; And Others. Parallel Block
Scheduling: Accommodating Students' Diverse Needs in Elementary Schools.
ERIC (No. EJ541055, Clearinghouse No.EC615918). Journal of Early
Intervention, v20 n3 p265-77 Sum 1996.
Describes the use of parallel block scheduling (PBS) in inclusive
classrooms as a flexible method of scheduling that addresses student
grouping; time for teacher planning; and scheduling of subjects, support
services, and staff. The characteristics of PBS and an elementary school
that uses the system are highlighted. (Author/CR)
Block Scheduling; Disabilities; Inclusive Schools; Regular and Special
Education Relationship; Time BlocksElementary Education; School
Schedules; Time Management
Hopkins, Harriet J.; Canady, Robert Lynn.
Integrating the Curriculum with Parallel Block Scheduling. ERIC
(No.EJ540803, Clearinghouse No.EA533090). Principal, v76 n4 p28-31 Mar
1997.
Although parallel block scheduling continues to benefit student
learning, it is challenged to meet the needs of new educational
programs, particularly whole language and interdisciplinary instruction.
Two illustrated blocks show how teachers can effectively divide their
time between whole-group and small-group instruction and integrate
science and math instruction and language arts and social studies
instruction. (MLH)
Block Scheduling; Educational Benefits; Integrated Curriculum;
Interdisciplinary Approach; Whole Language ApproachElementary
Education
Canady, Robert Lynn; Reina, Joanne M. Parallel Block
Scheduling: An Alternative Structure. ERIC (No.EJ457305, Clearinghouse
No.EA527599). Principal, v72 n3 p26-29 Jan 1993.
A major organizational change is necessary to promote more equitable
and effective instructional grouping schemes in schools. A palatable
restructuring alternative that combines effective grouping with the
flexibility to meet each school's needs is parallel block scheduling.
This system capitalizes on teachers' strengths, promotes greater mixing
of students, and provides uninterrupted direct instruction in critical
subject areas. (six references) (MLH)
Ability Grouping; School Restructuring; School Schedules; Time Blocks
Elementary Education
Greene County Schools VA; Instructional Grouping
Canady, Robert Lynn; Reina, Joanne M. Parallel Block
Scheduling: An Alternative Structure. ERIC (No.EJ457305, Clearinghouse
No.EA527599). Principal, v72 n3 p26-29 Jan 1993.
A major organizational change is necessary to promote more equitable
and effective instructional grouping schemes in schools. A palatable
restructuring alternative that combines effective grouping with the
flexibility to meet each school's needs is parallel block scheduling.
This system capitalizes on teachers' strengths, promotes greater mixing
of students, and provides uninterrupted direct instruction in critical
subject areas. (six references) (MLH)
Ability Grouping; School Restructuring; School Schedules; Time Blocks
Elementary Education
Greene County Schools VA; Instructional Grouping
Canady, Robert Lynn. A Cure for Fragmented Schedules
in Elementary Schools. ERIC (No.EJ378756, Clearinghouse No.EA522622).
Educational Leadership, v46 n2 p65-67 Oct 1988.
Now that regular elementary classroom teachers must plan their
lessons around special "pull-out" programs, their responsibilities are
compounded and their control over instructional time considerably
diminished. This article discusses the benefits of parallel block
scheduling as a possible solution. Includes seven endnotes
Lesson Plans; Planning; Scheduling; School Schedules; Time Management
Elementary Education; Teacher Responsibility
Next
|