Return to: U of M Home

Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.

One Stop | Directories | Search U of M

CAREIResearch Practice Newsletter Archive

Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI)
275 Peik Hall - 159 Pillsbury Dr. SE - Minneapolis MN 55455
Tel: 612-624-0300 - Fax: 612-625-3086

What's inside.

Volume 3, Number 1

In this Issue:

From the Associate Director

A Successful Early Reading Intervention Program for First-Grade Teachers

Scaffolding Reading Experiences to Promote Success

A Plan to Attack Fluency Problems

Reciprocal Teaching in the Fourth-Grade Science Program

Bringing Reading and Writing Together

 

 

CAREI > Research/Practice Newsletter

A Successful Early Reading Intervention Program for First-Grade Teachers

by Barbara Taylor, Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, University of Minnesota

Exciting things have been happening in recent years in early reading intervention. Many early intervention programs have been developed that have succeeded in helping low-achieving first-grade children learn to read. The best known is Reading Recovery, a one-to-one tutoring program provided by highly trained teachers (Pinnell, Fried, and Estice, 1990). While Reading Recovery is very successful, the program is expensive and serves a relatively small number of children.

Early Intervention in Reading (EIR) was developed for use by the classroom teacher (Taylor, Short, Frye, and Shearer, 1992). Procedures are similar to those used in Reading Recovery, but the first-grade teacher, not a tutor, provides an additional 20 minutes of daily reading instruction to a group of six or seven of the lowest readers in the class.

Generally, students work on one story for three days. Reading material for the first four months consists of shortened versions of picture books. (The original books are first read aloud.) Later, the actual picture books are used as the reading material. Shortened books are used at first so that children can feel successful with stories that interest them but that are too long, in their original form, for the children to read. The shortened stories used from October through November are 40-60 words long; the ones used from December through January are 60-90 words long.

On days one and two, the children read, with the teacher, the shortened story on a chart. Using the chart, the teacher works with the children on the sounding and blending of phonemes within words to develop children's phonemic awareness. Words with short vowel sounds are stressed first. The teacher also instructs children about the sounds of letters and the importance of using context clues and meaning to decode words as the chart is read.

On day one of a story, children in the group write three or four words from the story, phoneme by phoneme. Words are printed in a series of boxes with one phoneme per box. The teacher provides help as needed. On days two and three the children write a sentence about the story. The group decides on a common sentence. The teacher asks the children to give him or her the letters for as many sounds in the words they are trying to spell as s/he thinks they can successfully provide. S/he quickly tells them the rest of the letters. For example, if the children were writing "The chick couldn't swim," the teacher might ask the children what letters in "chick" spell /ch/ and /o(i,)/ and tell them the last sound is represented by "ck."

The shortened stories are reproduced in booklet form on half-page sheets of paper. The children illustrate their booklets in their free time or when the teacher is listening to children read individually.

In addition, each day the children reread the new story in booklet form with an aide or adult volunteer. If an adult is not available, the children can reread with partners. The partner may be from the group or may be another student in the class. The adult or partner should provide clues when needed, but the goal in rereading is for the children to try to read as much on their own as possible.

On the third day, the teacher listens to each child individually reread part or all of the story in the booklet. The teacher is careful to help the child with difficult words, but also encourages him or her to sound and blend easier words and to think about which word would make sense in the story. Throughout the instruction, the teacher emphasizes providing the children with strategies that they can use to decode unknown words when they are reading on their own.

After the third day, running records are begun on selected stories to assess student progress. At this point children are typically reading their stories with at least 92 percent accuracy. If not, easier stories are needed. The story is sent home at the end of the third day so the child can read it to a parent. The books are returned, or second copies are kept at school, so the child can continue to practice rereading the stories in the classroom.

References

Pinnell, G., Fried, M., and Estice, R. 1990. Reading recovery: Learning how to make a difference. The Reading Teacher 43: 282-95.

Taylor, B., Short, R., Frye, B., and Shearer, B. 1992. Classroom teachers prevent reading failure among low-achieving first-grade students. The Reading Teacher 45: 592-97.

 

 

©2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

Contact CAREI Webmaster | Contact U of M | Privacy

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on September 17, 2009

©2000-2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on September 17, 2009