Skip to main content.Return to: CEHD : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
 
CRDEUL. Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy.

What's inside.

About CRDEUL

Resource Center

Publications

Professional Development

Grants and Research

Awards

   

Resource Holdings

   

Contact

CRDEUL
340 Appleby Hall
128 Pleasant St. SE
Minneapolis MN 55455 USA
Tel: (612) 625-6411
Fax: (612) 625-0709
TTY: (612) 626-1014

E-mail: crdeul@umn.edu

   

CRDEUL Home

 
  CEHD > CRDEUL > Center Points > Faculty Report

CRDEUL <i>Center Points</i>.

   
 
   

Faculty Report

Changing Trends for Administrative Location of Developmental Educators within an Institution: A Pilot Study of NADE Members

David Arendale
Faculty Advisor for Outreach


Significant changes are occurring in higher education regarding restructuring of postsecondary institutions. Institutions are adopting business models. This is prompting institutions, especially public 4-year colleges and universities, to reevaluate their missions and, often, narrow their focus and concentrate resources in their strongest and most highly valued programs (Bastedo & Gumport, 2003). These dramatic changes occur simultaneously with heightened scrutiny of developmental education programs (Jehangir, 2002).

As a former national executive board member of the National Association for Developmental Education (NADE), I have monitored the shifts in membership of the professional association. Previously, the membership was equally divided between 2- and 4-year institutions. Now it is heavily shifted towards membership of educators from 2-year colleges. I was curious to investigate whether there had been a shift of where on campus these NADE members were located. Previous national research from the Exxon Study of Developmental Education indicated that student achievement outcomes from developmental education programs were higher if the programs were centrally administered and located within the campus (Boylan, 2002).

NADE provided me with a frequency distribution of the most common names of the campus administrative units where mail is sent to association members. About 2,700 records were analyzed. Approximately one-fourth of the records were discarded since it appeared that they were addressed to the person’s home address. The following are the top 10 departmental names, arranged from most frequent to least frequent:

  • developmental education
  • mathematics (regular department)
  • English (regular department)
  • developmental subject unit (math, reading, and writing)
  • humanities (regular department)
  • academic support
  • learning center
  • learning assistance
  • student success center
  • student support

A couple of interesting observations can be made. Not surprisingly, the most common name of the departmental unit for NADE members is developmental education. The surprise was observing that the regular academic departments of mathematics, English, and humanities occur with such a high frequency. Boylan (2002) indicated that some shifting away from centralized developmental education units may be occurring. This preliminary study seems to confirm that among the top 10 departmental names where NADE members receive their mail, only two have the words “developmental education” explicitly listed in their titles. It appears that centralized developmental education administrative units are becoming rare.

Further investigation is warranted. Some possible directions could be a more careful analysis of the original data set. Similar studies could be conducted with other professional associations in the field (e.g., College Reading and Learning Association, National College Learning Center Association). Follow-up interviews with a stratified sample of members could probe for the historic choices made concerning departmental names and whether changes have occurred in the intervening years. In any case, it appears that there is a shift in the administrative location of NADE members in comparison with past years. The meaning of these changes needs to be better understood and the potential impact upon the field of practice.

References

Bastedo, M. N., & Gumport, P. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U.S. public higher education. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 46(3), 341-359.

Boylan, H. R. (2002). What works: Research-based best practices in developmental education, Boone, NC: Continuous Quality Improvement Network with the National Center for Developmental Education, Appalachian State University.

Jehangir, R. R. (2002). Higher education for whom? The battle to include developmental education at the four-year university. In J. L. Higbee, D. B. Lundell, & I. M. Duranczyk (Eds.). Developmental education: Policy and practice (pp. 17-34). Auburn, GA: National Association for Developmental Education.

Back to Center Points Contents

Photo of David Arendale.

David Arendale
Assistant Professor, Social Sciences, General College
CRDEUL Faculty Adviser for Outreach


 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.