|
Alabama
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Some accommodations are listed
as non-standard and result in
only raw scores being reported.
|
|
Alaska
|
Combination
Participation
- An eligible disabled student
may meet state requirements for
passing the Modified High School
Graduation Qualifying
Examination (Modified HSGQE)
using any combination of testing
under standard conditions,
testing with the use of
accommodations, or passing an
approved alternative assessment
(Modified HSGQE or
Nonstandardized HSGQE).
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- HSGQE.
|
|
Arizona
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Scores of assessments taken
with alternate accommodations
will not be included in
aggregate results at the school,
district, and state level on the
paper reports provided by the
testing contractor. Only
students with IEP’s may be given
alternate accommodations.
|
|
California
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- California policy
differentiates between test
variations, accommodations,
modifications, and adaptations.
Test variations are available to
all students if regularly used
in the classroom. Accommodations
are available to students with
an IEP or 504 Plan.
Modifications fundamentally
alter what the exam measures or
affect the comparability of exam
scores and are available to
students with an IEP or 504
Plan. Adaptations are only
available to students taking the
alternate assessment.
|
|
Colorado
|
Combination
Participation
- Accommodations are
content-area specific therefore,
only those accommodations the
student requires for the
specific content area being
assessed may be selected. When
two or more content areas are
being assessed, such as reading,
writing and math, the student
may take the general math
Colorado Student Assessment
Program (CSAP) and the reading
and writing Colorado Student
Assessment Program Alternate
(CSAPA).The reading and writings
assessments cannot be separated.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Non-approved
accommodations/modifications
result in the student being
assigned a "no score" for the
purposes of state, district, and
school reports.
|
|
Connecticut
|
Selective
Participation
- The Planning and Placement
Team (PPT) may determine that a
child will not participate in a
particular district wide
assessment of student
achievement (or part of such an
assessment).
|
|
Delaware
|
Selective
Participation
- Students who are dually
eligible as students with
disabilities and English
language learners may be granted
an exemption from all or part of
the science and social studies
assessments if and only if both
of the following criteria are
met: 1.The student has been
enrolled in Delaware public
schools for less than one year.
2.The decision to exempt is made
on an individual basis weighing
the factors outlined in the
inclusion guidelines.
Combination Participation
- Students with Disabilities and
ELL students in grades 2-11 will
participate in the Delaware
Student Testing Program (DSTP)
unless included in the Delaware
Alternate Portfolio Assessment (DAPA)
and/or in an alternate
assessment to the DSTP reading
and writing tests.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Testing condition 3: students
may test with accommodations
that change the construct being
assessed. Such accommodations
interfere with the comparability
of student scores to the scores
of students testing under
standard conditions.
|
|
Florida
|
Combination
Participation
- Students may need certain
accommodations on some subtests,
but not on others. For example,
a student may need extra time
and testing in a small group
situation to complete extended
response questions, but can take
a test with multiple-choice
questions without
accommodations.
|
|
Georgia
|
Testing using
unique aggregated accommodations
- Conditional and non-standard
accommodations are more
expansive accommodations that
should be used sparingly but do
not affect the reporting of
scores.
|
|
Idaho
|
Combination
Participation
- If the IEP team determines
that the student meets the
criteria for participation in
the alternate assessment and
he/she is working on content
standards within the general
education curriculum, the
student may participate in
relevant portions of the regular
assessments and participate in
appropriate areas in the
alternate assessment.
|
|
Indiana
|
Combination
Participation
- It may be determined by a case
conference committee that a
student would benefit from
participation in both the
Indiana Statewide Testing for
Educational Progress-Plus
(ISTEP+) and the Indiana
Standard Tool for Alternate
Reporting (ISTAR). In this case,
ISTAR is considered a
supplemental assessment to
ISTEP+, not an alternate to
ISTEP+.
|
|
Iowa
|
Combination
Participation
- In some instances, it may be
decided that a student should
participate in general
assessment in one content area,
but alternate in the other two.
|
|
Kansas
|
Combination
Participation
- A student may participate in
any combination of the state
assessments with the exception
of the state alternate
assessment.
Testing
with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Some students may be eligible
for the Kansas Assessment of
Modified Measures (KAMM). A
modification is a change in the
procedure for test
administration, which will in
some way change what is being
measured. The use of
modifications results in an
invalid score and the student is
considered to be not tested when
calculating the participation
rate for AYP purposes. The
student’s score will also not be
included when calculating the
proficiency rate for AYP
decisions.
|
|
Massachusetts
|
Combination
Participation
- A separate decision must be
made for each subject scheduled
for testing, a student may take
the standard test in one subject
and the alternate assessment in
another.
Testing using unique aggregated
accommodations
- A non-standard accommodation
is defined as an accommodation
which changes the way a
Massachusetts Comprehensive
Assessment System (MCAS) test is
presented or the way a student
responds to test questions which
may alter a portion of what the
test is intended to measure.
Performance level results for
students with
disabilities-whether they take
the standard tests with standard
or nonstandard accommodations,
or without accommodations, or
participate through the
Massachusetts Comprehensive
Assessment System-Alternate
Assessment (MCAS-Alt), are
aggregated in MCAS reports with
the results for students who
took the tests without
accommodations. Scaled scores
for tests taken with either
standard or nonstandard
accommodations are also
aggregated in MCAS reports with
scores of tests taken without
accommodations.
|
|
Michigan
|
Combination
Participation
- Participation with
accommodations or in the
alternate assessment is
determined content area by
content area.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Non-standard accommodations
change the construct that the
assessment is measuring
rendering scores that are not
valid. Use of nonstandard
accommodations may adversely
affect a student’s eligibility
to earn a MI Merit Award
scholarship; in addition,
students who use nonstandard
assessment accommodations will
not count as being assessed for
the calculation of the NCLB
participation rates for both the
school and district.
|
|
Minnesota
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Modifications are available
for students taking a basic
skills test (i.e. for students
who entered grade 8 prior to
2005-2006). Modifications change
the meaning of the test score.
No modifications are available
for the Minnesota Comprehensive
Assessments-Series II (MCA-II)
or other accountability tests.
|
|
Mississippi
|
Combination
Participation
- Students may need
accommodations when testing in
one content area but may not
need them when testing in
another content area.
|
|
Montana
|
Combination
Participation
- It is permissible for a
student with disabilities to
take the Criterion-Referenced
Test-Alternate (CRT-Alternate)
in one but not both subject
areas.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- On the CRT, non-standard
accommodations change what the
test was intended to measure.
The score achieved on the test
taken with a non-standard
accommodation would be reported
in the ‘novice’ performance
category; the score becomes
invalid; the student is
considered to be a
non-participant when calculating
the participation rate for AYP
purposes; further, the results
of a test taken with a
nonstandard accommodation are
not included in the calculations
of AYP.
|
|
Nebraska
|
Combination
Participation
- If a district uses multiple
assessments, a student may
participate in the general
assessment on some and in the
general assessment with
accommodations on the others.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Assessments with modifications
must be reported at the
"beginning level" of the grade
in which the student is
enrolled.
|
|
Nevada
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Modifications affect the
validity of test scores.
Students using modifications
will be placed in the lowest
achievement category for that
test and will not be counted for
participation.
|
|
New Hampshire
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Use of an accommodation in the
"Modifications (F)" section will
invalidate the session(s) in
which it was used and no credit
will be given.
|
|
New Jersey
|
Combination
Participation
- Students with disabilities
shall participate in the
Alternate Proficiency in each
content area where the nature of
the student’s disability is so
severe that the student is not
receiving instruction in any of
the knowledge and skills
measured by the general
Statewide assessment and the
student cannot complete any of
the types of questions on the
assessment in the content area(s)
even with accommodations and
modifications.
|
|
New Mexico
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Assessments taken using a
non-allowed modification will be
invalidated; the student will be
counted as a non-participant in
the determination of the
school’s participation rate and
as a "no score" in the school’s
performance results.
|
|
North Dakota
|
Combination
Participation
- A student may participate in
the North Dakota state
assessment for one content area,
and in the North Dakota
alternate assessment for the
other content area(s).
|
|
South Carolina
|
Combination
Participation
- Students may take one subject
test with accommodations and
another without depending on the
student’s needs.
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- A modification alters the
construct that a test measures
and changes the meaning of the
test scores.
|
|
Texas
|
Locally Selected
Assessments
- The school district and
Admission, review, and dismissal
(ARD) committee determine a
Locally Determined Alternate
Assessment for students who are
receiving an alternate Texas
Assessments of Knowledge and
Skills (TEKS) curriculum.
|
|
Utah
|
Testing with
modifications or non-standard
accommodations
- Modifications are changes in
the test or assessment
conditions that fundamentally
alter the test score
interpretation and
comparability. Providing a
student with a modification
during a state accountability
assessment constitutes a test
irregularity because it
invalidates the student’s test
score. Test scores from a
modified test administration
will not be counted toward
percent proficient for
determining AYP, nor will they
count as participation in a
statewide assessment.
|
|
Vermont
|
Out-of-Level
Assessments
- The adapted assessment option
is based on out-of-level
administrations of the general
statewide assessments.
Testing
with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- IEP teams do have the
authority to use unapproved
accommodations on the assessment
for a student. However, these
tests will be considered
non-comparable to the general
assessment and scored as invalid
in the school accountability
index.
Locally
Selected Assessments
- The student’s team may select
modified assessments or prepare
a portfolio of work samples that
will be submitted to the
Department’s Alternate
Assessment Program for review
and scoring. A student’s support
team can also select two content
areas from the Lifeskills
Portfolio format to assess using
the portfolio method.
|
|
Virginia
|
Selective
Participation
- Students participating in the
Virginia Alternate Assessment
Program (VAAP) may fulfill
federal participation
requirements by submitting
collections of evidence for the
content areas of only math and
reading.
Testing with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- A student who has passed a
Standards of learning assessment
utilizing any accommodation,
including a non-standard
accommodation, has passed for
all purposes, including earning
verified credit.
|
|
Washington
|
Combination
Participation
- The IEP team should take many
factors into consideration when
choosing the most appropriate
assessment option in each
content area.
Out-of-Level Assessments
- The Developmentally
Appropriate Washington
Assessment of Student Learning
(WASL DAW), allows students to
take the WASL at a grade level
that best matches their
abilities. The IEP team will
select the grade level WASL that
most closely matches the
student’s current
developmental/instructional
level.
|
|
Wisconsin
|
Combination
Participation
- Separate decisions regarding
the need for accommodations or
alternate assessment must be
made for each content domain
included in the Wisconsin
Student Assessment System (WSAS)
regular assessments.
Locally Selected Assessments
- The department’s policy on
alternate assessment also
encourages educators to use data
collected for determining a
student’s present level of
educational performance as the
student’s alternate assessment.
This policy enables students
with disabilities to have their
performance measured using
methods (classroom-based tests,
teacher observations, etc.)
most-closely aligned with the
objectives identified in the
student’s IEP.
|
|
American Samoa
|
Out-of-Level
Assessments
- If the student can take the
SAT but is very low in
performance, it may be useful to
change the content of the test
by administering an earlier
grade level. Normative scores
are not valid for any of these
modified administration formats.
Testing
with modifications or
non-standard accommodations
- Normative scores are not valid
for any of these modified
administration formats.
|
|
Palau
|
Selective
Participation
- Even though a student may not
be able to take all parts of the
Palau Achievement Test, the
student should be included in
those parts in which
participation is possible.
|
Table B.4:
Specifications and Descriptions of
"Other" Circumstances in Which Students
Are Not Included in any Form of
Statewide Assessment
|
Alabama
|
Exclusion
Prohibited
- No students are exempted from
state assessments based on
demographics, instructional
program, or type of school.
|
|
Alaska
|
Other - A
student who has arrived late to
the system or experienced a
sudden and traumatic event close
in time to the student’s final
test may be eligible for a
waiver [from the High School
Graduation Qualification
Examination (HSGQE)
requirement].
|
|
California
|
Parent Exemption
- Allowed on Standardized
Testing and Reporting (STAR)
only.
Medical Condition/Illness
- Allowed on STAR and California
High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE).
|
|
Colorado
|
Other-
Foreign exchange students;
Students who are incarcerated in
the Department of Corrections.
|
|
Hawaii
|
Other- A
student who is receiving
services at an out-of-state
residential program; A student
who meets the requirements of
Regulation 4140 and withdraws
from the school system before
the first day of the official
testing window; A student who is
dismissed from school.
|
|
Maryland
|
Other - The
student has demonstrated by past
performance that he/she cannot
function in a testing situation;
Students attaining senior status
subsequent to the opening of
school in the 2003-2004 school
year are no longer required to
take and pass the MD Functional
tests.
|
|
New Mexico
|
Other -
Foreign exchange students.
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
Parent Exemption
- A student may be excused from
the assessment if a parent
believes the test conflicts with
religious beliefs.
|
|
South Carolina
|
Other -
Expelled students (unless the
student has an IEP).
|
|
Texas
|
Other -
Certain immigrant ELL students
may qualify for a LEP exemption
from Texas Assessment of
Knowledge and Skills (TAKS),
TAKS-I, or State-Developed
Alternative Assessment (SDAA II)
during their first three years
of enrollment in U.S. schools if
necessary. ELL students can be
exempt from the Texas English
Language Proficiency Assessment
System (TELPAS) if their reading
instruction is below the level
of reading simple words and
sentences. An ELL student may
also be exempt from the Texas
Observation Protocols (TOP) on
the basis of his/her disability.
|
|
Utah
|
Other - ELL
students enrolled on or after
April 15th of the current school
year and who are new to the
United States (first year of
enrollment in any U.S. school)
are exempt from all state tests.
|
|
Vermont
|
Other -
Students who are experiencing a
family emergency or student
crisis; Students who enroll in
the school after the testing
window; Students who are
expelled or suspended for the
entire test administration
window.
|
|
Wisconsin
|
Other -
Unspecified reasons for not
completing the test.
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
Other -
Students with disabilities
convicted as adults under RMI
law and incarcerated in adult
prisons.
|
|
Micronesia
|
Other -
Students
with disabilities convicted as
adults under FSM law and
incarcerated in adult prisons.
|
|
Palau
|
Other -
Students with disabilities
convicted as adults under Palau
law and incarcerated in adult
prisons.
|