11:30 am
Pacific, 12:30 pm Mountain, 1:30 pm Central, 2:30 pm Eastern.
1.5 hours duration.
States are exploring multiple ways to assess students with disabilities who do not currently “fit” well in available assessment options. Among the strategies to develop new options is that of empirically drawing the line between accommodations that support use of results for accountability and those that do not. Key questions being asked include:
This telephone conference will focus on research and practice considerations related to these key questions.
Please e-mail Rachel Quenemoen at quene003@umn.edu with your questions, comments, and ideas for future telephone conferences, before or after our May 1 call.
In order to get the most out of our May 1 telephone conference, please review these materials online, or if you prefer, download them to your computer, or print them out. Thank you.
Note: Some of the files below require Acrobat Reader. If you don't have this software, go to the Acrobat Reader Web site for a free download.
a. Test Accommodations and Test Validity: Issues, Research Findings, and Unanswered Questions (Stephen G. Sireci)
b. Georgia Modification Research Study (Sharron Hunt and Melissa Fincher)
a. U.S. Department
of Education Toolkit on Teaching and Assessing Students with Disabilities
http://www.osepideasthatwork.org/toolkit/index.asp
b. National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD) Parent Advocacy Briefs
Researcher Panelist
Stephen G. Sireci, Professor in the Research and Evaluation Methods Program and Director of the Center for Educational Assessment in the School of Education at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst
State Panelists
Georgia
Department of Education Assessment Director Sharron Hunt
Georgia
Department of Education Assessment Assistant Director Melissa Fincher
Federal Panelists
OSEP: David Egnor and Cynthia BryantCo-hosts
Stanley Rabinowitz,
Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center
Rachel Quenemoen and Martha Thurlow, National Center on
Educational Outcomes